3

Prelude: All this is not about personal, or about me or just you. It is so much bigger than that. You knew this and chose
the path you were walking. Like Miss M the esquire said, in her own words: this is so "Monumental" if this goes forward.
And like Caroline said: "It's a story about The People. She ... used ... America. It's about the Country."

Dearest Daisy - it is true. I can not deny it. I was put in a choke hold. Stretched out by 4 people while
another held me by the throat until, as they put it, "he stopped moving." You breathing ? You moving. You
not breathing. Then you are not moving. Hummm. Still you knew all of this. You say many things. But I am
the one who did not know things about you. Things you never told me. Like, the abortion you had. The pain
in your belly, you say. The abortion you had in Shanghai with the other boyfriend. A boyfriend that you said was
only just a friend, "no relations." So -- what happens after the last breath ??? What journey occurs --

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:52:14 -0700 (PDT)

From: <signed ... 4 ... @yahoo.com>

Subject: just one more thing

To: "yang mingzhi" <daisyyang117@yahoo.com>

> My Dearest Mingzhi Yang

> To make sure everything is documented.

> So ...

> wanted to thank you so very much for helping me with

> the 7th on Sixth emails / faxes. And with helping

> getting Kelly's (People's Revolution) dvd's prepared

> and out to her (as promised). I am sure she

> appreciated you bringing them to her this past week.

> Oh right, you didn't help me with anything like you

> said you would. And Kelly never got the dvd's,

> Another week lost. thank you. just wanted

> documentation complete. Why is it your words are

> so empty ? Oh forgot or did not realize, as you

> have taught me ... because it wasn't something you

> needed or wanted - the self concern. signed him.

> If a man is left to be angry what will he be ? If a

> man is made to feel comforted what will he be ? ppy. makes sense. no ?

> __________________________________________________

> Do You Yahoo!?

Okay my darling -- you are my wife and I have to deal with all that you are and all that you do, this is true -- the many things
you try to hurt me with and so many other people intentionally with. But I must say - I never complained about certain things.
AS our emails, while you were here, do show. I only asked of late about these things, after you told me you were signing a
lease, for yourself. The things I asked about ... like why you have not been close, or why you do not speak with me and talk
about the things inside of you, plus your tone being so nasty and why you do not cook a meal for me even if it is boiling water,
or the laundry. You may say someone else does it. But -in fact- you are my wife, were my wife, and you should want to do
these things together. Like when you are doing your wash, why do you never ask me to do it with you ? I have said I would
love too.

Is it all about you ? So -- we should get it all out to surface. Not about the us just about the you. If I am wrong, you have
proved I am not. But maybe, just maybe ... it is really about ... The Universe. Something Life wanted. The all of this.

Remember i know you so deeply from the inside. From inside the heart. There is a part of you that you see. The part that you
recently told me about. A part that I told you I could not see in you. The part that would let good be destroyed. "Stubborn."
That is the word you used. A better word you might find is "Hubris." You should learn its definition. When stubborn -- it must
be realized. Or no good shall come of what you said of yourself -- you are "stubborn." Sometimes you have to flex a bit, be
more bending. See the story about "The Oak and the Willow." A good story you and many people can learn something from.
Especially in understanding the self and your self. Some might think it should never come to a moment where a yoga class
is -more important- than a wife seeing her husband. But for you, that always seemed more important. Like many other
things. So I let you do that and everything else you wanted without being a nag. Remember the quality -you- told me about ?
"Stubborn." Cold. Nuclear wars can be started like that. It can be wrong when human affairs are at stake. Like the school
thing you mentioned to Merrill -- she told me you did not tell the whole story, the whole truth. The usual way it has been. So I
am learning.

We both without question said if you get the scholarship for NYU that would be great and you would go. But we also agreed
that if they turned you down you would work with me "for the next 2 years" and would look for something in the industry to
further your career, and then after that if you wanted to try to pursue the school thing further that would be great. And there
was reason for that -- you know it. It was because I was older than you on the timeline and my life would be much shorter
than yours and it was thought that it would be nice to spend the very first two years being closer to each other. So this is the
whole truth on that story and the reason for the understanding -- "agreement " we talked about. I will die long before you and
you would still have plenty of time for schooling and educational courses. Two years was too much too ask --

You could not even do 6 weeks or 10 weeks, much less than 2 years. I know that. I saw that. Do you really call that faithful ?
Or someone to trust ? I have believed in you always. As stupid as that may sound or be. Maybe you forgot what most would
think you were supposed to concern yourself with and remember. Or why did you take the commitment ? Not for love. If it
were for love we and all those concerned would not have to be here in this place. Makes no sense, except for some other
motive at hand. You knew what you were doing. Every bit of it. Especially all about my life, works, and experiences. Yet and
still it will always be with you. Like you have made this here. To know you did not stand by what you said and what you say is
the reality.

I find no blame in you for anything.

When your eyes open -- this will all be with you. The deepest truth. Do Not let the stubborn side of you be the destroyer.
Would be happy to stand by my words, all those written. And so that is the case. "I do" stand by my words. And by you, given
the chance. We have nothing to argue about. And we never really did. You know that is true. We never did have a quote
unquote argument. Well that is something to say for 5 1/2 months.

But you know i have to respond to this Aug 21 rant of yours on me. Don't know why you did it. Maybe because you knew you
should spend time with me on my birthday and you had other things more important. I don't know. We should have talked
about it more. All you can be blamed for in the eyes of who may see is you leaving. So since you want to keep beating me ...
I, in all fairness to myself and you, am going to respond to this beating on permenant documentation written -when you
could have just spoke to me- the way we always did in our written writings. You were missing too.

Read below. And everything is set right for the record ... okay. You are wrong here. But that is not a matter � or of any issue.
I never cared for who's wrong or right, that was never to make a difference. Just the close bonds we have known together.
That is what mattered. Forward we go.

This is your response to my Kelly documentation (note: above.)

Date:Sun, 21 Aug 2005 10:17:55 -0700 (PDT)

From: "yang mingzhi" <daisyyang117@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book

Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more

Subject: Re: just one more thing

To:<signed � 4 � @yahoo.com>

Daisy Yang writes:

"I am here to document something too."

4: yes you are hunny -- you "know" this. I agree. Life will use you like it did Tali. You know exactly who you are ... what you
were doing, and then what you would be. If you married me it would be self declared. Like the wife of. : ) Whether you or I
like it or not. It would just be. And you knew this. You know what I speak of. We'll get to it, "the word" -- momentarily. You
were well aware of the workings of / and everything that goes with it. So do not try to act like any of this is news to you or new
to you. You know and knew exactly what you were getting into. You built on that (including our psychic connection) and you
built it up even yourself. You knew I would feel you even if you were not there. I asked do not start if you were going to bring
damage and hurt to me that would last for the rest of my life - caused by memory, and the inner psychic. This was not to be
a game. You told me do 2 or 3 books on what we document. Remember - all. Could not get lost from that. So let us go on.

D: "Since things have reached to this point, i have to say there are reasons for everything �"

4: Of course I know that. Need an example being given ? Husband's wife says, "family in china" statement "with another
man." You are right, reasons. Your reasons. I don't have reasons, I just loved you. And let you do whatever you wanted, not
wanting to smother you or keep you from having experiences and adventures in the City of The World. Let me rephrase that.
I don't have reasons ... I don't have to have reasons, I loved You. I married you. Remember ?

D: "Once again let me make myself clear --- i made the decision to come to this country, just because i love you, i trust you, i
am confident for you and our relationship, otherwise i will not choose to come ---"

4: Then how come in the very first week of our massive writings - in the email dated Nov. 7, 2004 you say you have to find a
way to make "my" dreams, a/k/a Your dreams come true ? Is that not it ? And is it not in writing -- MOTIVE.

There was no together there yet. You told me before, at another time - that your dream was to come to New York. You came
for the fashion connects and for the freedom, no ? All that New York had. You said the rules in China were "troublesome", if I
recall (remember in writing) but then throughout the summer 2005 you said you did "not care about America". So which is it ?
Make up my mind. Still you could have just talked about these things as people do and should. Would have got more out of
it. Your words appear as contradictions. This is the great example you give to the world ? Let's continue.

D: "i was living so comfortable in life, and i was doing such a good job in my career back in that

Country --- there are provement of everything."

4: Again it is what you say when you write here. But no one can believe that is all truth. "So comfortable" you say ? You told
me after you got here that you in China you were making $ 4000 a year. That was your salary. You lived in a 6 floor walk up
tenement building. Your parents do the laundry. And you say you don't like living off them. So is it that you were doing so
well and this country could do no better for you ??? YOU told me you worked in McDonald's also for "50 cents an hour." That
is $ 5 dollars a day for 10 solid hours work. That's living "so comfortable" ? And the cost of a burger there is like it is here.

So what are you saying here, that America could not provide those dreams or greater opportunity ? And America would
allow you to fly freely in the world. I remember the push you were making for travel docs on us, like forcing us -- even in
March, you wanted the liberty issued immediate. Morgan would know too. Your actions speak louder than your words. You
can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can not fool everyone. So maybe at $ 4000 a year and no worldwide
freedom and the guilt of living off your parents was not so comfortable a life as you really say. Although you used everything
here well - for your own purpose. Now, I never did question why you came here. I thought we both had the same reasons.
But now maybe I should be asking why. Yet, still I don't. I remain true to all that we created. I just watch what you do.

If you were never coming back you could have just took off the wedding band and given it back when you had that opportunity.
Why even walk away, to pretend ??? IF this was at any time about love, any sort of True love -- you know what will happen. If it
is not it will show. You know this is how we used to write so don't make like this is unusual either. We wrote Long. That is
also true. Specific. So everything is all laid out. Like always.

D: "But the next day after i got to the door of your 'shared with ex' apartment, i got to know more about you, which was never
shown in our tons of e-mails."

4: You didn't get to know more, you learned one thing. But we covered it in our ground work as we laid out the terms designed
to assure the relationship would remain. And you were prepared to honor those terms. So you offered. Yet, the moment Jiang
Weimin said let's do a tv show "Daisy In New York" you had no need for me, us anymore. All you cared is you were going to be
a Star. And there you throw everything away. As I said you didn't get to know more, you learned only 1 thing. I was the one who
learned more. 1st thing was about the abortion you had with a boyfriend in China. He who was, as you said: "only a friend." It
was me who learned of that person from energy in the airwaves and asked about it. I guess we could call that you less than
honest. Plus the 3 meals cooked you did with this person. You also went to events and many other interactions with that same
person. Using people ? This is finally going to get cleared up. Is it safe to say thank God here -- or am I in trouble for God too ?

A) first of all, when we - you and I - even talked about this marriage really happening -- and it was real, I went out and was
looking for a space and I was the one who was finding another apartment -- separate from the live / work space. As you will
recall correctly. Even this "ex" you rip on can testify to that. As you very well know too. I was trying to find the new apartment.
Oh you think you found any of the spaces ? True. The one you found was this Flushing one with Ryan from the Sinovision
Building -- who you met at the American Museum of Natural History press event in New York City, that I brought you to. B) You
said it was easier if the place on the Eastside was kept. You knew the lay of the land. Not innocent are you here. You said it
was "easier for now" (dead of cold winter), just pay for the space on the Eastside what we would pay someone else. And you
said okay to live there. I did not necessarily want that. You said, quote: "not a problem." So where was your strength for us, for
me, for you, for all of our relationship ? And something for the universe ? But there's more. So much more. SO much: deep in
content. Oh it is easy to throw words around. I would think not to let that happen.

Like you said to me, the truth is you "got comfortable" in the Astoria, Queens apartment and with the freedoms you gained by
our marriage. So where is love (?). The immigration process used to take many years to achieve. To confirm and make sure
a relationship was about love, not a Fake. Bona fide. Or if the marriage was used as a way to get into the Country the person
was removed. The method INS would use to see if it was an honest relationship is: a couple would not quit on each other.
They would endure the test of time. After 2 or 4 years it would prove to society an example of love is real, of great power. Maybe
you just seem to think you can get around everything. I don't know, is that true ? Sort of like the January 6 visa. Fake things.
Or maybe you just think this is all like HBO's Sex In The City that you watched over and over in China on video, the where you
learned to speak English so well. Are you fake things ? Like I said, we shall see. Is that not true ? If there was a problem upon
your arrival or at anytime you could have just said "let's get a different place and leave." Enough money was spent either way.

Like July and August, you alone spent over $4000 in just 2 months. Using the so called "ex" as a dagger in me does not stand
correct. You could have just said "we have to go", anytime. So guess there was no problem when it worked for you and you
could sleep all day while on the computer all night with you know what. Now, LASTLY on this point, "nothing stands in the
way." I think I recall you saying that. No, I don't think it. I know and you know that is the understanding / agreement / contract
you entered in. Your written ageements, proposals and commitments. You knew all this. Here in this email you are trying to
use ploys like a jagged edge. The word: "nothing." You agreed, nothing. You said "nothing" would stand in our way. Yet you
put things there. And adhere to it willingly -- to try for stubborn with destruction. I can not do that. Nor let you. Still I will just love
you, leave it at that ... and others will see what you said and if your actions, dedications are / were the same as you speak.

D: "---you can give me the terrible face that is never seen

in real life but only in nightmares whenever you want,"

4: I wish I knew this - you write of. There are thousands of different looks. But only one you have in mind. Now I am the
bad guy because of some look on a person's face. Is it the look people get when they are puzzled ? Or is that the look of
sadness you don't like because I know what you are doing. We discussed it. What many Asian girls do once in America.
When they get comfortable with the environment. You know about that truth. You are not supposed to be that. Maybe Jodi
would say, "You should be trying." The how she got 20 years down the road with two kids plus still the husband, a family.

"D: you can blame on me any 'mistakes' i have

made although they were all for "good will",

4: Right -- a woman saying to her husband 5 and a half weeks after she is married she was thinking about going to have
a family with some other man, as you would say: "were all for good will." Nothing to do with good will there, nothing at all.
Self serving maybe. All "SELF SERVING" is more what that really is. Like all this or any of this is "good will" ? That is your
claim here. Wisdom always knows: talking things out is ... good will. I blame you for no "mistakes." I have never blamed
you for anything. I have never said "I blame you for � " Never, not once. Facts are I don't blame you for anything or any
mistakes you think you have made. I only can blame you, if for anything now, for trying to -like I said- destroy all we are
responsible for and were to build. Life builds. There is no need to break it down. That is your desire. And for convenience.

"D: you can take all the rest of the money that I have brought

with me from my parents that they say it's for emergency,"

4: I NEVER and you know this -- never took anything ever from you. Food was paid for, laundry, all the everything, the ring, had
a dress secured for you - blah blah blah, etc. I do not have to bring this up this. You paid back one thing. You know that. And
you know the why you returned that expense. After you insulted us as a family (the "you know what statement") and when you
decided you were going to leave May 1. I asked you not to do that, remember ? Remember, I asked you not to go. Stop
blaming me for your actions -cause you're doing a good job and unfairly. I did not want you to leave. Nor did I insult our family.

And you only came back from JFK May 2 because you knew you wanted the documents. Remember you said, you "worked on
it so long already to get them. Did not want to start over again." I took nothing. Furthermore any funds that were returned were
used on you after you decided to appear again from the May JFK thing. You want me to pay everything and have you stomp on
my heart too from Feb to April. I also did that through the month of May and half of June too, paid expenses. We have always
gotten along very well. Two people should realize how much they need to communicate with each other to save what is good.

D: "you can kick me out of the door"

4: I have never kicked you out the door. And you know that too, AS A FACT. Another creation of -- Fake Things -- from you. The
door was always open to you. And even when you left you knew, you knew the door was "open for you 24 hours a day" without
question. You could take that for granted. I always wanted you here or near me. You had the keys to the upper Eastside space
from the day you entered this Country. You know that -door- was always open for you to return or come through any time you
wanted. So be the true facts. Absolute. You said � you wanted � the time to "prove" yourself to me. Remember 10 weeks,
so I could get work done. It was when you told me just days after I had completed and submitted all the Immigration papers
that you got a one year lease somewhere else for yourself: that is when I started to question what was going on. What did it
say ? True colors started to show. Warning signs appeared. There is when I raised a flag, the deepest concerns -- August
18th at Broadway in the Park and August 20th sitting outside of the Eastside apartment. Then after August 20th you � did all
of this. I just wanted to see you. I wonder what you are hiding ? Maybe many people are wondering by now what you are hiding.

So to put this issue that someone wanted to "kick" you "out the door" to bed, no one kicked you out anywhere You left -- you
went to the airport. Security watched you from morning and all into the next day. Don't you think JFK airport has monitors ? A
female middle class asian sitting with a wheelbag not getting on a plane. Extra work for everybody. And then after that I am to
trust you ? Totally unrealistic. Still, I did. Well they say that ... "love is blind." Maybe it is true. You fail to mention that YOU went
freely and on your own when I asked you not to. Now that you made me have to recall this, as with everything - I don't think I
have ever once heard you say the words, "I'm sorry." I never thought about it before. Just for an extra piece of human interest.

D: even my parents begged you not to let me go,

4: This again is not true. Addressed your mom (the begging issue) in another writing in the email. We can put it here.
That issue is cleared for the record.

Re: the above.

Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:48:29 -0700 (PDT)

From: <signed ... 4 ... @yahoo.com>

Subject: To Save Your Mother's Dignity

To: "yang mingzhi" <daisyyang117@yahoo.com>

man." It was when your mother found out you said that and those exact words to

your "Husband" there she was so heartbroken, then and only then, she begged

"forgiveness." Because you ... disgraced ... her in a way she had never heard of

or imagined. I was there, I lived it. I know. You are not going to lie again to fool

yourself. Now there is the truth. It had nothing to do with what you did on May 1st

or June or anything thereafter. I tried to lay down for 20 minutes but could not. This

was bothering me. The light in my head went on. Maybe I heard her (mom's) spirit

say: "defend me." So I could not let you reduce her - your mother - to someone who

begs. Especially in written History. She never "begged." She -asked- for forgiveness,

and ... understanding. That is what she did. And I would not let the merit of that -good

deed- be torn apart or at: as you did, have done today -- only so that you could use that

and her as a dagger in me. Sorry. You are not going to be allowed to lie with regard to her.

Won't allow it. I know what you do. And I think you do too. I AM setting the record straight.

Here is the example of how you would even try to use your own mother to hurt me. And she

was a good woman. Well you did suceed. I did get hurt and was hurt when I laid there on

the futon and realized what you did -- used your own mother, and tried to use your own

mother. And then lied about what it was about. It was about what you said. And I need

not repeat it - it is word for word written above, in quotes. Now ... would you like to call me

a liar ? There are two distinct stories -portrayals- here. One is telling the truth. The other

did not. One is playing a game. The other is watching and realizing. I was sorry when

I realized what you just did. These are your true colors ?????

I think you let your ego ruin what I once knew was a true heart. What you did here was

not true, it was malicious -- even using mom. sorry, can not let that happen. So here

like I said, the record stands corrected. She was an honest woman. You are sometimes

over spoiled. Too busy being used to always getting your own way. When you find your

heart - let me know about it. Then I will see if it is true. signed, really your husband (not

some other man). There is the email addressing your mother "begged."

D: you allow your "ex" to come to interrupt almost everytime we are having sex,

4: Again you are amazing. I never allowed the ex to ever interrupt us. I "allowed." You know that is an outright lie. Matter of
fact, I not once "allowed" anyone to interrupt us. But also we had the front room -- which considering, was 70 feet away. If
anyone interrupted us -- it was a phone call that came in afterward. No one ever even came near us unless it was to close

the door. Maybe you like to have the door open when you are making noise. I never thought of it in that way. Kinky girl. And
you know I would not even take one phone call during intimate moments. You said this just to make things up ? I see that. Or
maybe there is something I don't know about. If anything bothered you, like someone closing the door while you were having
sex, noisy, you could have said so. You could have gotten a separate place with your husband. Like you were supposed to.

Onward ... finally I can address all this. Instead of you making me your scapegoat. It gets better.

D: you can be crazy when you know i am not that religious and don't know much

about it.

4: I have never been crazy or this you say. As everyone who has met me knows I am not crazy about religion to start. You know
life is just about nature or the scientific functions of the universe for me. I don't do religion, per se. Energy mass. Spiritual.
Historical timelines. Yes. And most correctly "evolusion" combined with "intelligent design" is what all life is built on.
Intelligent Design - planned. Like you coming together. As you would say, "no coincidence." How East meets West. If you felt
distant or removed from the many peoples different religions because you lacked knowledge, you could have just asked me
and I could tell you what history some different cultures are. But you didn't care about the subject anyway. We talked about that

4: I have never said these words, you "are the wife of the God" or "a god." Never at anytime in all my life have I ever said I
was a god or acted like that. Yet seeing your statement here it does say to me you do understand this subject more than
you let on to. I have only said, "I am an Individual" - "I am a human being." Something you do not recognize or honor. Now
since you use the subject of God here for your own malicious ploy and purpose, vainty, and meaning, and with no respect -
it clearly says you care not about the Universe or all the things it is made of. I do care about all that I can humanly possible.

This (what you wrote here in this communication) is all your defense to cover up one issue, because I said something
about you not getting the stuff to Kelly. As anyone can see above at top. If any of this was a problem you could have talked
to me. You are just looking for excuses. I am not giving that to you. Here is the record totally straight. Two sided, not one.

I never said that in that way with that meaning. You make things up the way you want, as you go along. I was surprised when
you told me recently you "do not believe in God." News to me. Never got that sense from your writings. You the one doing mystics
and (sixth sense) - psychic sciences -- unexplained things. Did you say: we hear each other before it is written, spoken ? Things
like that. ("we speak out what the other doesn't speak." documented bottom of the previous page.) However, I do feel that each
person should believe what they want and what is good for their "self." Not what someone tells them they should believe or
wants them to believe because someone merely says so. The only sort of problem, if there was one (which I never saw as a
problem), is a lack of knowledge in this subject. Although from all this it does not appear you lack knowledge in the subject at
all. As we will see more. If you wanted to know about those things you'd only have to learn about them. Not a hard subject. It is
more correctly stated that you did tell me to my face you "do not care about the subject." I just said nothing and left it at that.

To save your mother's dignity I must say this ... your mother did not "beg"

to let you stay, as you say. It had nothing to do with May 1st -- or June.

Your mother did not beg for anything without just cause. She was a sincere

woman who in the world of honesty should have the truth spoken of her, what

she did, and what was done to her. Your mother only begged one thing ---

"forgiveness" and asked that I let you stay when she found out, after all the

other deceits you played ..... then you said ..... to me, the following: "what

if I wanted to go to China to have a family ?" And I said, " what you are

going to have our family in China ?" And you then said "No, with ... another

You my darling, it appears use anything and everything one sided. You can live with this for the next 50 years. Leave it the
way it is or make it good, better. Plus we have not even gotten to the good stuff yet. Should not be this way and should not
have had to be this way. But everything has to come out. You knew it would write itself. The Book does that. As you also
know: this is just one writing. What about 750 over 90 days that lays it all out. Sex at the desk at work at Channel Young
Shanghai Media. The what you spit out in the sink. The change you made with that here. The deeper side, the profound,
the lighter side, the spiritual, and the hot and sexy. Why you like to wear a thong. The purple nightie. Where it came from.
And what you wanted to do with it. A person shows their true colors here. America does that. Want blame, blame yourself
-- I will not blame you. Period.

Shanghai Media Group. re: Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai
Media Group Yang MIngzhi a/k/a Daisy was going to forge the
President of Channel Young's signature. Shanghai Media
Group. Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai Media Group.
Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai
Media Group. Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai Media Group.
Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai
Media Group. Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai Media Group.
Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai
Media Group. Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai Media Group.
Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai
Media Group. Shanghai Media Group. Shanghai Media Group.

C) you knew the apartment was shared with a female, a very longtime friend. The only thing you did not know is she was an
"ex." But you learned right away that I have not been involved in that way for over 8 years. I noticed you did not mention this
person did the laundry for you -- taught you how to do wash -- and cooked you meals for months. That's interesting. And
you were well aware that I work with that person like I do with many others on the The Cool project. Based on the "lastly" in
this section: "nothing in the way" � there should have been no problem and you could have talked to me in depth about any
real concerns if there were any. There were always options and solutions. You were "never going to leave" me was the
commitment. And we would work on any of the bumps in the road. So you said. -- gave you inner most true and honest word
on that. Just remember. Maybe you forgot. Too much. I know another girl like that. Set up "the choke hold." It seems you
mirror Ilana and Nicole wrapped into one.

Jiang Weimin, Jiang Weimin - The Destroyer, Jiang Weimin,
Jiang Weimin, Jiang Weimin, Jiang Weimin, Jiang Weimin, Jiang
Weimin, Jiang Weimin, Jiang Weimin - The Destroyer, Jiang
Weimin - The Destroyer, Jiang Weimin - The Destroyer, Jiang
Weimin - The Destroyer, Jiang Weimin - The Destroyer, Jiang
Weimin - The Destroyer, Jiang Weimin - Duke University -
Shanghai Media Group, Jiang Weimin - Duke University -
Shanghai Media Group, Jiang Weimin - Duke University -
Shanghai Media Group, Jiang Weimin, Jiang Weimin, Jiang
Weimin, Jiang Weimin, Jiang Weimin The Destroyer, Jiang
Weimin The Destroyer, Jiang Weimin The Destroyer. Jiang
Weimin. Jiang Weimin. Jiang Weimin. Jiang Weimin. Jiang
Weimin. Shanghai Media Group, Jiang Weimin. known in history

THIS BECOMES heavy RELEVANT TO THE NEXT PAGE.

To know the truth of what is and who knew what.

What entity does the World have in it ?

Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 00:49:33 -0800 (PST)

From: "yang mingzhi" <daisyyang117@yahoo.com>

Subject: miss u

To: signed ...4... @yahoo.com

IT's a busy afternoon but i got some time to this

quiet place in my heart anyway to write to u. Almost

going to be worn out in the huge pile of work and to

make things worse, the period is coming. :( Not feel

shy to let u know this.

I was thinking all the time after i sent u my last

mail--u r a spiritual one instead of a religious one ...

It's good.

okay words jam and let me just end it there. miss u

Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 06:08:20 -0800 (PST)

From: "yang mingzhi" <daisyyang117@yahoo.com>
Add Mobile Alert

Subject: good morning re: still love u ? why not ???

To: signed ...4... @yahoo.com

After i read ur simple explanation of "spiritual", and

the reason why they wanted to kill u, i think i should

love u more, cause u r doing something good,not evil.

And i began to wonder that why u were afraid that i am

going to love u no more.